Legal Opinion
Muther v. United Shoe MacHinery Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 15, 1927No. 743PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This is an infringement suit based on letters patent No. 1,112,643, issued to plaintiff October 6, 1914, on his application filed January 31, 1914. The bill of complaint was filed August 19, 1916.
The patent involved has already been held to be a valid patent by Judge Anderson, whose decision was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 288 F. 283.
The proceedings were referred to a master “to take and report--to the court an account of” defendant’s profits “and to take and report an account of any and all damages to which the plaintiff may be lawfully entitled, which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rude v. WestcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Dobson v. Hartford Carpet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Flat Slab Patents Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mathey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
- Parker Rust Proof Co. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1928
- Ceeco MacHinery Manufacturing, Ltd. v. Intercole, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
- Mathey v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.