Legal Opinion
Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 26, 1946No. 4280PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
We are concerned here with the amount of compensation defendant should pay plaintiffs for infringement of patents held valid and infringed by decree dated February 8, 1935. The patents involved, their nature, their character, their advantages and limitations and the annals of the long extended litigation between plaintiffs and defendant and the city of Milwaukee are largely reflected by the findings of fact and opinions in Guthard v. Sanitary Dist. of Chicago, D. C., 8 F.Supp. 329, affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 7 Cir., 90 F.2d 727, and affirmance of a like decree…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Porter v. Household Finance Corp. of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974
- La Salle Street Press, Inc. v. McCormick and Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Faulkner v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.