Dobson v. Hartford Carpet Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS FROM THE CIROUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR TIIE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. These°were all suits in equity for alleged infringements of patents. The facts are stated in the opinion of tbe court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatcheoed
These are three suits in equity, brought.in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, against John Dobson and James Dobson, trading as John and James Dobson and as “ The Falls of Schuylkill Carpet Mills.” No. 1 is brought by the Hartford Carpet Company, for the infringement of design letters patent No. 11,074, granted March 18,1879, to the plaintiff, as assignee of Winthrop L. Jacobs, for three and one half years, for a design for carpets. No. 2 is brought by the Bigelow Carpet Company, for the infringement of design letters patent No. 10,778, granted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Birdsall v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Manufacturing Co. v. CowingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. And Hawe Yue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Du Bois v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dobson v. DornanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.