Legal Opinion

Hall v. Durham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1888No. 13,522PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case, appellee, Durham, plaintiff below, has moved this court in writing to dismiss the appeal herein for the following reasons, namely:

“ 1st. The record of the proceedings in the court below,, filed in this court, is incomplete, in that this was a suit, as shown by the record, which originated before a justice of the peace, and was appealed from the justice to the Montgomery Circuit Court; and the record contains nothing but a copy of the original complaint and bond in replevin, the special finding of facts by the court and its conclusions of law thereon, the exceptions thereto, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McFadden v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Kramer v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Entsminger v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Pacey v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jacksonville Street Railroad v. WaltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  3. Three States Lumber Co. v. BlanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Howard v. Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Knowlton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API