Legal Opinion

Entsminger v. Jackson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 6518PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— This was a suit by the appellees against the appellants, to recover the possession of three thousand feet of walnut lumber, alleged, inter alia, to be of the value of $135.00. On the trial of the cause, the appellees recovered *145judgment, from which, judgment this, appeal is prosecuted by the defendants below.

In this court the only error assigned by the appellants is the decision of the circuit court, in overruling their demurrer, for the want of sufficient facts, to the second paragraph of the appellees’ complaint.

In said second paragraph of complaint, the appellees alleged, in substance,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. LittleIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. McCarnan v. CochranIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Ridenour v. BeekmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Field v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Kramer v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McFadden v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Farris v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ludlow v. LudlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Bringley v. C. I. T. CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Hoke v. ApplegateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API