Legal Opinion
Three States Lumber Co. v. Blanks
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1907PublishedCited by 14 opinions
FROM SHELBY. Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of Shelby County.— J. P. Young, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister
The plaintiff below, H. B. Blanks, recovered a- verdict and judgment against the Three States Lumber Company for the sum of $2,176.80 as damages for the conversion of a lot of lumber. The Three States Lumber Company appealed from said judgment and has assigned errors. There is no assignment of error on the sufficiency of the facts to support the judgment, but questions of law only are sought to be reviewed on this appeal. The claim of the plaintiff below is substantially set forth in the second count of the declaration as follows:
“The plaintiff avers that the said defendant on or about…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Litchfield v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Packet Co. v. CloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Power Packing Co. v. BorumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Tallent v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Griffin v. BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Mayor and Aldermen of Town of Morristown v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.