Legal Opinion
Burns v. Rohr Corporation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 20, 1972No. Civ. 69-132PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WALLACE, District Judge.
Prior to 1943, Rohr granted rest periods to women employees only. From 1943 to 1946, Rohr had a formal rest-break policy whereby both male and female employees were granted a ten-minute break during each four hours the employees worked. In 1946, a “personal time privilege” policy was instituted in lieu of the formal ten-minute rest-break policy, whereby both male and female employees were allowed to visit such places as the payroll office, credit union and employee accommodation store at convenient times during his or her normal. working…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Mrs. Lorena W. Weeks v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Mrs. Lorena W. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sessions v. Morales-SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki FirpoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- People v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Homemakers, Inc., Los Angeles v. Division of Indus. Welf.District Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Gerstle v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.