Legal Opinion
William Hibbs, United States of America, Intervenor v. Department of Human Resources Charlotte Crawford Nikki Firpo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 2001No. 99-16321PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
William Hibbs brought suit in district court against the Nevada Department of Human Resources, its director, Charlotte Crawford, and Hibbs’ supervisor, Nikki Firpo (collectively “Defendants”), for violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ( “FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as various state-law claims. He timely appeals the district court’s grant of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on his federal claims and the dismissal without prejudice of his state-law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited102 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Nevada Department of Human Resources v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rahne Pistor v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Motoyama v. Hawaii, Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Centro Familiar Cristiano Buenas Nuevas v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mary Touvell v. Ohio Department of Mental Retardation and Developmental DisabilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.