Legal Opinion

PPL Corp. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 2013No. 12-43PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

In 1997, the United Kingdom (U.K.) imposed a one-time "windfall tax" on 32 U.K. companies privatized between 1984 and 1996. This case addresses whether that tax is creditable for U.S. tax purposes. Internal Revenue Code § 901(b)(1) states that any "income, war profits, and excess profits taxes" paid overseas are creditable against U.S. income taxes. 26 U.S.C. § 901(b)(1). Treasury Regulations interpret this section to mean that a foreign tax is creditable if its "predominant character" "is that of an income tax in the U.S. sense." Treas. Reg. § 1.901-2(a)(1)(ii), 26 C.F.R. § 1.901-2(a)(1)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Biddle v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Heiner v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. WylyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Unionbancal Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API