Unionbancal Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
‘When does a taxpayer cross the fault line between the cheering fields of tax planning and the forbidding elevations of form over substance, far enough, at least, to require a transaction to be recharacterized for tax purposes? No map — statutory, regulatory or otherwise — precisely reveals this point of no return. Rather, ... the judicial traveler [is] guided only by multifactored analyses, balancing tests and other forms of ad hocery, which, if properly employed, serve hope that the terrain’s true character mil be revealed.” 2
This case is about LILOs and, relatedly,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CNT Investors, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
- Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- CNT Investors, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
- CNT Investors, LLC, Charles C. Carroll, Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2015
- Exelon Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016