Legal Opinion

Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1932No. 378PublishedCited by 180 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

This proceeding was brought for the redetermination of a deficiency in income tax for the year' 1923. The respondent, Chicago Portrait Company, is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business at Chicago. It owned 51 per cent, of the capital stock of the International Art Company of Sydney, Australia, a foreign corporation. Respondent received dividends from the International Art Company and sought credit for a proportionate part of the income taxes paid by that corporation to the Commonwealth of Australia, to the State of New South Wales, and to the Dominion of New Zealand.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  5. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. MorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by180 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  4. Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976

175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API