Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. Stiffler

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1935No. 5512PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

The plaintiff, Shell Oil Company, brought this action against the defendants M. Ernest Stiffler and Edith Stiffler upon what is denominated in the pleadings, a “lease and consignment contract” and “service station lease.” By the terms of the “service station lease” defendants leased to the plaintiff certain premises in Ogden City, Utah, upon a rental of $35 per month and 1 cent per gallon for each gallon of gasoline purchased from the Shell Oil Company over and above 3,500 gallons during such month. By the terms of the “lease and consignment contract” the Shell Oil Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Chambers v. LivermoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Utah National Bank of Salt Lake City v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Swanson v. SimsUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Montgomery County v. New Farley Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Salt Lake County v. KartchnerUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Harline v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hunt v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Ratcliffe v. Union Oil Co. of Calif.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API