Legal Opinion

Bennion v. Hansen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1985No. 18925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

This is an appeal from a judgment affirming the disposition of an estate in accordance with an amended trust instrument. The appellants seek reversal on grounds that the trust instrument, which by its terms was irrevocable and unamendable, took effect before it was amended and, therefore, the amendment should have been ignored. We affirm the trial court.

Plaintiffs Layne, David, and Donald Bennion (“the Bennion brothers”) sued Lloyd Hansen and John Van Leeuwen in their capacities as trustees of the Grover A. Hansen Trust, seeking to enforce the terms of a 1972 declaration of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. McCollum v. ClothierUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hardy v. HendricksonUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Controlled Receivables, Inc. v. HarmanUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Agrelius v. MoheskySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc. v. WoodsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Salt Lake City Corp. v. James Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Pete v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  4. Ron Shepherd Insurance, Inc. v. ShieldsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Warner v. RasmussenUtah Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API