Legal Opinion
In Re Shearin
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 2000No. 99-BG-5PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
This reciprocal disciplinary matter is based on a proceeding which was instituted against respondent K. Kay Shearin in Delaware. See In re Shearin, 721 A.2d 157 (Del.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1122, 119 S.Ct. 1776, 143 L.Ed.2d 805 (1999) (Shearin I). In Shearin I, the Supreme Court of Delaware suspended Ms. Shearin from practice in that jurisdiction “for a period of one year commencing January 1, 1999, and ending upon her reinstatement, for which application may be made after January 1, 2000.” Id. at 166. Rule 23(a) of Delaware’s Rules of Professional…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cratty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- In Re RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- United Parcel Service v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Watkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.