Kerin v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Appellant contends that the findings of the Industrial Commission are conclusions of law subject to review rather than findings of fact which are conclusive. While counsel differ as to whether the question presented is one of law or- one of fact it is unimportant as we view the undisputed facts. It is not claimed that the employer had agreed to actually transport the deceased or other employees engaged on the Evansville job daily to and from their place of work. In appellant’s brief it is said:
“The employee, Kerin, in this case, never boarded, roomed, or lodged in Evansville.”
Nelson, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rock County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Bloom v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Geldnich v. BurgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Ohrmund v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Githens v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pribyl v. Standard Electric CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Doering v. State Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Horvath v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.