Legal Opinion

Ohrmund v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed February 7, 1933:

Rosenberry, C. J.

Sec. 102.03, Stats. 1929, imposes liability for compensation where the following conditions of compensation occur: (1) where the employee and the employer are subject to the provisions of the act;

“(2) Where, at the time of the accident, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment.
“Every employee going to and from his employment in the ordinary and usual way, while on the premises of his employer, shall be deemed to be performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment.”

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. AlthoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bloom v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Geldnich v. BurgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hornburg v. MorrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Krause v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Eckhardt v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Horn v. SANDHILL FURNITURE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Kerin v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Githens v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API