Legal Opinion

Doering v. State Labor & Industry Review Commission

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 14, 1994No. 93-2025PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

Schlueter Company and the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) appeal from a circuit court judgment reversing LIRC's order denying worker's compensation benefits to the estate of Kurt A. Doering. The court held that Doering's fatal injury, suffered while he was commuting from home to work, was compensable under the Worker's Compensation Act, ch. 102, Stats. Schlueter argues that Doering was not performing services growing out of and incidental to his employment at the time of his fatal accident as required under § 102.03(l)(c)l, Stats., and therefore it cannot be liable. We disagree…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pabst v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Nigbor v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Dilhr v. LircWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Industrial Commission v. LavachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Thayer v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Smithey v. HansbergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Boatright v. SpiewakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Local 60, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API