Legal Opinion
H. Rouw Co. v. Texas & N. O. R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 24, 1953No. 12574PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.
This suit was instituted by the H. Rouw Company against the Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company to recover damages in the sum of $242.57 on a shipment of tomatoes made in interstate commerce from Edinburg, Texas, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The case was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury and resulted in the court sustaining the defendant’s plea of limitation and rendering judgment that plaintiff take nothing, from which judgment the H. Rouw Company has prosecuted this appeal.
It ⅛ stipulated by the parties that the plaintiff was entitled to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burns v. Chicago, M., St. P. & Pac. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Burns v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
- Barber v. Southern Pac. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Morrell & Company v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Polaroid Corp. v. Hermann Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Hanger v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Polaroid Corp. v. Hermann Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.