Legal Opinion
Burns v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided February 5, 1951No. 6320PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGE, District Judge.
On motion of defendant for summary judgment, premised on the ground that the freight claim loss here, sued on is barred by the provisions of Section 20(11), Title 49 U.S.C.A., and by the terms of the bill of lading applicable to the shipment of certain live stock from Two Dot, Montana, to Clearing Stock Yards, Illinois, on October 4, 1947, the following undisputed facts appear of record herein. After arrival of such live stock at Clearing Stock Yards, plaintiffs, on October 17, 1947, made claim against defendant, through their duly authorized' agent, Chicago Live Stock…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeatherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- A. G. Reeves Steel Const. Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Kithcart v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Moses v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- John F. Jelke Co. v. SmietankaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burns v. Chicago, M., St. P. & Pac. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Polaroid Corp. v. Hermann Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- H. Rouw Co. v. Texas & N. O. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Cammack v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.