Legal Opinion
Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 13, 1984No. 1369, Docket 84-7222PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
The question on this appeal is whether the notice of disallowance of a claim made pursuant to a Uniform Straight Bill of Lading started the running of the limitations period. Plaintiff Combustion Engineering, Inc. (Combustion) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Dorsey, J.), entering summary judgment for the defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) on the ground that plaintiffs claim for damages was time-barred. We reverse the grant of judgment and remand this case.
I
In May 1977 certain equipment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- William A. Cordingley v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- John Morrell & Company v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Burns v. Chicago, M., St. P. & Pac. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Westhemeco Ltd. v. New Hampshire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Belfiore v. New York Times Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
- Cocco v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
- Dipaolo MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Prestige Equipment Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Universal Manufacturing Corp. v. Associated Rigging & Hauling Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Burtman Iron Works, Inc. v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.