Polaroid Corp. v. Hermann Forwarding Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentGibbons, Circuit Judge
If I were a juror I might very well construe the correspondence between the shipper, Polaroid Corporation (Polaroid), and the carriers’ insurer, Transport Insurance Company (Transport), in the same manner as Judge Hunter does in the majority opinion. However, it is neither in the province of the district court in ruling upon the motion of the carriers, Hermann Forwarding Company (Hermann) and Kowalsky’s Express Service (Kowalsky), for summary judgment,1 nor in ours in reviewing that determination, to draw any inferences in favor of the insurer in assessing its intention in drafting these…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- John K. Rains v. Cascade Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Newark Morning Ledger Company, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Scott v. PlanteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Robinson v. Trustees of the New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.