Legal Opinion

Mary Jane Stevens Co. v. Foley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1926No. 4302PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

The Foleys were engaged in a mercantile business in Ogden City. They leased the premises on which they carried on their business from the Mary Jane Stevens Company. Under our statute the lessor is given a lien for rent due upon all the property of the lessee not exempt from execution as long as he shall occupy the leased premises and for 30 days thereafter. The statute further provides that when any rent shall become due the lessor may apply for a warrant to seize the property of the lessee and to sell it in payment and discharge of the lien.

On February 13, 1925, the company, in the state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Galbraith v. VallelySupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Hoover v. Mortgage Co. for AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. KershawUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Brown v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State Tax Commission v. IversonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Van Leeuwen v. HuffakerUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Brandley v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API