Hoover v. Mortgage Co. for America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The question of jurisdiction of the District Court in Oregon to make the order appointing the receiver of the properties not included in the security held by the appellee must be decided adversely to the appellants. The complaint in the foreclosure suit was of wider scope than appellants contend for. It alleged insolvency of the defendant corporations, default in payments due hy them, that the collateral securities were in plaintiff’s hands in Oregon; that maintenance and operation of the irrigation system was necessary: that the lands affected and covered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Murphy v. John Hofman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Pacific Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Interior Construction & Improvement Co. v. GibneySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tennessee Pub. Co. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Equitable Trust Co. v. A. C. White Lumber Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1930
- Mary Jane Stevens Co. v. FoleyUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Liberty Royalties Corp. v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940