Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Kershaw

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1981No. 16719PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order finding appellant, Walter W. Kershaw, guilty of contempt for failure to deliver a well permit under an earlier decree, and assessing $190,500 damages. The issues are the applicability of the defense of impossibility of performance and the measure of damages, including attorney’s fees.

In August, 1970, appellant as vendor entered into an option contract to sell one Christensen a 480-acre parcel of land in Millard County “together with a 6 C.F.S. well permit purchased from Milo and Boyd Watts, of Kanosh, Utah.” The contract also included another…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Wheadon v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Beckstrom v. BeckstromUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Richards v. HodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Davidson v. MunseyUtah Supreme Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cabrera v. CottrellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Piacitelli v. Southern Utah State CollegeUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API