Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cook

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1953No. 7959PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Plaintiff Tommie Maurine Brown, respondent here, instituted habeas corpus proceedings to gain custody of Ronald Glen Cook, her three year old son, from defendants Harold and Cora Cook, his paternal grandparents. Glen H. Cook, father of the child, was out of the state in the military services and not available for service of process at the time the action was commenced and he was not made a party to the action. He left the child in his parents’ custody. In June, 1952 the father and mother were divorced in an action commenced by her in Wyoming where she was then living, but…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peacock v. BradshawTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. McMillin v. McMillinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  3. Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Little v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Maloney v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Connors v. ConnorsWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bradshaw v. KershawUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Eatchel v. LanphereSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Bartholomew v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API