Legal Opinion

Van Leeuwen v. Huffaker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1931No. 5021PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DILWORTH WOOLLEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover a judgment for a commission alleged to be due a real estate broker. There was a trial before the court and a jury which resulted in a judgment, entered upon a directed verdict, in favor of defendant, from which plaintiff appealed. That judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. 74 Utah 441, 280 P. 235. Another trial was had, but before the court sitting without a jury, at the conclusion of which findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and judgment was made and entered thereon in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Knauss v. Gottfried Krueger Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Scribner v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Leathers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Empire State Insurance v. American Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Potter v. Ajax Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maine v. GarvinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Sweeney & Moore, Inc. v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. HannaUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Findlay v. National Union Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ogden Livestock Shows, Inc. v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API