Watson v. Consolidated Laundries Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
Defendants moved for judgment on the plead- ' ings, asserting that the complaint was insufficient in law. Plaintiff made a cross-motion for leave to serve a supplemental summons to bring in additional parties and to serve an “ amended ” complaint. Defendants’ motion was granted, and of this plaintiff does not complain.
Plaintiff’s motion was likewise granted, but the order entered thereon changed the relief so as to permit the service of a “ supplemental ” complaint. Defendants appeal from the order in so far as it related to plaintiff’s motion. The granting of the order in this respect was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Isaac v. MarcusNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Horowitz v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hornstein v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942
- Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Koch v. EstesNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Ponticello v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Strauss v. Kende Galleries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.