Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1906PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Bernard Goodman, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the.Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 11th day,of January, 1906, granting leave to the plaintiff to serve a so-called “ amended and supplemental complaint.”

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

This action was commenced in June, 1905. In the original complaint the plaintiff alleges that she is the lessee of certain premises belonging to the defendant, and that the defendant had caused a portion of the leased premises to be cut away for the purpose of *14constructing water closets and shafts, and threatens to further cut away the ceiling and floors of the leased premises and to construct such water closets,and shafts without ‘the authority and consent of the plaintiff; and the plaintiff demands that the defendant be restrained from constructing and .maintaining said water…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prouty v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Koepp v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Milliken v. McGarrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Washington Life Insurance v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Watson v. Consolidated Laundries Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Brewster v. F. G. Brewster Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API