Legal Opinion

Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1956No. 36,647PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to the findings of the trial court made after a trial partly to a jury and partly to the court.

The facts essential to a determination of the questions decisive of this appeal, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and the court’s findings, may be stated briefly as follows:

Prior to March 1949 plaintiff had considerable experience in construction work and real estate sales and promotion. He had familiarized himself with the laws, regulations, and procedures relating to the construction of housing projects under the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hartung v. BillmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Benedict v. PfunderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Associated Cinemas of America, Inc. v. World Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Cox v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Zobel & Dahl Construction v. CrottySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API