Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Zobel & Dahl Construction v. Crotty

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1984No. C5-83-879PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Zobel & Dahl Construction sued David Crotty for Crotty’s failure to pay Zobel & Dahl for the construction of a residence near Duluth, Minnesota. Crotty had paid Zobel & Dahl $67,000, but refused to pay the remaining balance of the contract price because of certain defects in the house. Zobel & Dahl claimed Crotty owed $13,-552.56 and impleaded several of the subcontractors including Builders Supply Company, suppliers of roof trusses.

A jury trial was conducted and answers to special interrogatories returned by the jury found Crotty had breached the contract by failing to allow…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Nodland v. ChirpichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Cox v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  4. Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Itt Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. Amerishare Investors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API