Legal Opinion

In re Ward

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 20, 1956No. 6208PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoRlet, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 13 to 17, inclusive, of appellants’ application for a patent on a method of detecting flaws in a test body, and a testing agent for use in such method. Claims 1 and 13 are illustrative and read:

1. The method, of detecting in a test body subsurface flaws having surface openings, comprising the steps of applying to the surface of the body a water-emulsifiable testing agent having a color contrasting with the surface…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Application of StanleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1931
  3. In re DunbarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  4. In Re FischelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  5. In Re LaughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. In re OckertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Application of John W. Hession, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. De Graffenried v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. Application of Jesse T. Dunn and Alex E. Brodhag, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API