Legal Opinion

In re Jennings

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 4, 1948No. 5448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHateield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 15 in appellant’s application for a patent for an invention for a freezing container.

Claims 3 and 4 were allowed by the Primary Examiner.

Claims 1 and 6, which are typical of the appealed claims, read:

1. As a new article of manufacture, a sharp-freezing container for substances to be frozen, and partitions for dividing the container into a plurality of ice ■cube molds, said partitions being formed of resilient,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of BorcherdtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. In re OckertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. In re RussellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Application of Richard A. Ward and Robert C. SwitzerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API