Legal Opinion

In re Budnick

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 15, 1976No. Patent Appeal No. 76-517PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 25 through 28 of application serial No. 813,385, filed February 28, 1969, for “Chelation.”1 We affirm.

The Invention

Claimed are hydroxymethane diphosphonic acid and alkali metal and ammonium salts, thereof, having the following formula:

wherein Ri, R2, R3, and R4 are selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkali metal (e. g., sodium potassium, etc.), and ammonium. These compounds are useful as chelating or sequestering agents. Claim 25 is illustrative:

25.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Application of Frantz Lund and Wagn Ole GodtfredsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. In re GlassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. Application of Jean Clement Louis FoucheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. In re ArmbrusterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re WisemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. In re HOWARTHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. In re StrahilevitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API