Legal Opinion
In re Armbruster
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 27, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 75-514PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This appeal is from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals, affirming the rejection of claims 45-51 and 53-55 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, in application serial No. 327,335, filed January 29, 1973, for reissue of patent No. 3,560,343, issued February 2, 1971, for “Low D.E. ■ Starch Conversion Products.” Claims 1-9 and 32-44 have been allowed, and claim 52 has been indicated allowable if rewritten in independent form. We reverse.
THE INVENTION
Sugars, such as dextrose, may be obtained from starches by breaking up large starch molecules through…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Janis RobinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of John Nicholson Gardner, Anthony Maitland Roe and George Lawrence WilleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Rengo Co. Ltd. And Simon Container MacHinery Limited, in No. 80-2556 v. Molins MacHine Company, Inc., in No. 80-2557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- In re AngstadtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In Re Godfrey Newbold HounsfieldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.