Legal Opinion

In re Wiseman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 26, 1979No. Appeal No. 79-508PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-3, 6, 9, and 10 in appellants’ application serial No. 639,391, filed December 10, 1975, a continuation of application serial No. 223,949, filed February 7, 1972, for “Grooved Carbon Brake Discs,” as obvious from the combined teachings of Ruppe1 and Benini.2 We affirm.

The Invention

Appellants’ invention pertains to a disc brake assembly, primarily for aircraft applications, wherein there is a stack of alternating rotating and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. In re SponnobleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. In re BurckelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. Application of Willie Fong, Amon H. Brown, William L. Wasley, Robert E. Whitfield and Lowell A. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. In re HellsundCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re KubinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. In re OelrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. In Re Stephen E. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API