Legal Opinion
Hubshman v. Louis Keer Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 23, 1942No. 7726PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs are a partnership engaged in business as factors, and their residence and place of business is in New York. The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, and is engaged in the wholesale shoe business in Chicago, and has been so engaged since 1911.
The following facts appear from the court’s findings and are supported by substantial evidence in the record.
Since 1931 the defendant had been selling a brand of shoes known to the trade as Truman shoes, and its business in this line of shoes had grown from a little over $10,000 in 1931 to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ward v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Guthrie v. J. J. Newberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Evans v. HowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Bagley v. Cleveland Rolling Mill Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1884
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Norfolk & Western Company v. United States of America, and Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Saverslak v. Davis-Cleaver Produce Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Hudson Sales Corp. v. WaldripCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.