Legal Opinion
Hudson Sales Corp. v. Waldrip
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1954No. 14511PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Paragraph one of the complaint, as amended, alleged: “This action is for fraud 1 and, in the alternative, arises under the anti-trust acts of July 2, 1890 and October 15, 1914, as amended, U. S.C. Title 15, Sections 1 to 15”, 2 and it was on the basis of these allegations that plaintiff sued for the damages claimed.
The defendant, Hudson Motor Car Company, the manufacturer of Hudson cars, was not served with summons and did not appear in the cause, and at the close of the trial, the action was dismissed as against it with prejudice to the plaintiff.
The defendant, Hudson…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Packard Motor Car Company v. The Webster Motor Car Company, the Webster Motor Car Company v. Packard Motor Car CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Schwing Motor Company v. Hudson Sales CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- H. W. Martens and Robert A. Maurin, Jr. v. Carl F. Barrett, B. C. Farcell and the Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. ShubertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.