Legal Opinion

Stone v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1944No. Civ. 14146PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to enforce a covenant and agreement entered into by certain lot owners, by the terms of which it was agreed that said lots should not be used or occupied by persons other than the Caucasian race. Defendants and appellants are Negroes who purchased and occupied one of said lots, so restricted against such occupancy.

The record reveals that said agreement and declaration of restrictions was executed in 1927; that the property in question lies within an area in the city of Los Angeles bounded on the south by Adams Boulevard, on the north by Washington Boulevard, on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Wayt v. PateeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. GaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Porter v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Trautman v. HokrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Payette Lakes Protective Ass'n v. Lake Reservoir Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hurd v. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Hudson Oil Co. v. ShortstopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API