Legal Opinion

Dale v. Keisling

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 24, 2000No. 98C-18552; CA A105873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

At issue in this case is whether proposed initiative Measure 2000-15 contains two or more constitutional amendments that must be voted on separately under Article XVII, section 1, of the Oregon Constitution. Secretary of State Phil Keisling (Secretary) and the trial court concluded that it does not. We conclude that it does and reverse and remand for entry of judgment reversing the Secretary’s decision and declaring that Measure 2000-15 does not conform to Article XVII, section 1.

Measure 2000-15, if enacted, would amend the constitution by creating a new article, to be known as Article IX-A.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lehman v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Swett v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Meyer v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API