Legal Opinion

Schon v. National Tea Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1969No. 4858PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the trial court wherein a demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s petition.

On May 11, 1967, plaintiff’s cause of action was dismissed for failure to prosecute. A new action was commenced under the provisions of Section 2305.19, Revised Code, by the filing of a petition on May 11, 1968. 1968 being a leap year, the month of February contained twenty-nine days. Thus plaintiff’s petition was filed on the three hundred sixty-sixth day after dismissal. Was the petition timely filed?

Section 2305.19, Revised Code, as pertinent, reads:

“In an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Clarence P. Sherman v. Air Reduction Sales Company, Division of Air Reduction Company IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  3. State ex rel. Gareau v. StillmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Winn v. NilsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Crump v. BatieOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Mokrytzky v. Super Systems Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-1-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Lane v. Spencer Municipal HospitalCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2013
  5. Sauter v. Integrity Cycles, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API