Schon v. National Tea Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the trial court wherein a demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s petition.
On May 11, 1967, plaintiff’s cause of action was dismissed for failure to prosecute. A new action was commenced under the provisions of Section 2305.19, Revised Code, by the filing of a petition on May 11, 1968. 1968 being a leap year, the month of February contained twenty-nine days. Thus plaintiff’s petition was filed on the three hundred sixty-sixth day after dismissal. Was the petition timely filed?
Section 2305.19, Revised Code, as pertinent, reads:
“In an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Clarence P. Sherman v. Air Reduction Sales Company, Division of Air Reduction Company IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- State ex rel. Gareau v. StillmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- Winn v. NilsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Crump v. BatieOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Mokrytzky v. Super Systems Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-1-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lane v. Spencer Municipal HospitalCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2013
- Sauter v. Integrity Cycles, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.