Legal Opinion

Mokrytzky v. Super Systems Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-1-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 2007No. 87929UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} This appeal is before the court on the accelerated docket pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc. App.R. 11.1.

{¶ 2} Plaintiff-appellant, George Mokrytzky, et al. ("Mokrytzky"), appeals the trial court's dismissal of his complaint against defendant-appellee, Super Systems, Inc. ("Super Systems"). Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.

{¶ 3} On November 22, 2005, Mokrytzky filed a complaint against Super Systems pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"),47 U.S.C. § 227. In the complaint, Mokrytzky alleged that he received an unsolicited advertisement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jemiola v. XYZ Corp.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 2003
  2. Schon v. National Tea Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NVR, Inc. v. CentervilleOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Cox v. Dayton Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Cox v. Dayton Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API