Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gareau v. Stillman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1969No. 69-251PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The controversy in this case revolves around the meaning of the phrase “calendar year” as used in Section 3513.191, Revised Code.

It is relator’s contention that such phrase has a well-defined and customary meaning of from January 1 to December 31.

Respondents urge that such phrase merely means the passage of 365 days. Respondents argue that a liberal construction should be given to such phrase to enable persons to become candidates for public office.

It is a fundamental principle of statutory construction that words in a statute should be construed in their ordinary and natural meaning, and be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newman v. Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. People Ex Rel. Shaklee v. MilanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Metzer v. Connally Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tibbles v. Teachers Retirement System of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. State v. StallingsOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Finch v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Layman v. WooOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Schon v. National Tea Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API