Legal Opinion
Clarence P. Sherman v. Air Reduction Sales Company, Division of Air Reduction Company Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1958No. 13242PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Circuit Judge.
This appeal challenges an order of dismissal in an action for personal injuries. The question presented is whether the district court was correct in determining that the appellant’s claim was barred by the passage of time under Ohio law. At issue is the proper construction of the Ohio statute which permits a second action to be brought within one year after a prior action has failed otherwise than upon the merits. 1 The facts out of which the controversy grows are relatively uncomplicated.
On July 29, 1952, the appellant, while working for a third party on a construction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, and Its Local No. 8-631 v. Delta Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Carrigan v. California State LegislatureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Andrew v. Bendix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.