State v. Gribskov
Court of Appeals of Oregon
RICHARDSON, J.
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
The state appeals an order suppressing marijuana seized pursuant to a warrant. ORS 138.060(3). The issue is whether the affidavit upon which the warrant was issued alleged facts sufficient to create a well-reasoned suspicion that marijuana could still be found at the described premises.
The relevant allegations are:(1) Within 72 hours prior to the swearing of the affidavit the confidential reliable informant was inside the residence; occupied by defendant;(2) The informant observed a quantity of marijuana "more than one ounce”;(3) The marijuana was in the possession of the occupant of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. KittredgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. SpicerOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. BrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. KoppenhaferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. Strubhar/JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986