Legal Opinion

State v. Gribskov

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 24, 1980No. 18-877 (79-570), CA 15500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

RICHARDSON, J.

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

The state appeals an order suppressing marijuana seized pursuant to a warrant. ORS 138.060(3). The issue is whether the affidavit upon which the warrant was issued alleged facts sufficient to create a well-reasoned suspicion that marijuana could still be found at the described premises.

The relevant allegations are:(1) Within 72 hours prior to the swearing of the affidavit the confidential reliable informant was inside the residence; occupied by defendant;(2) The informant observed a quantity of marijuana "more than one ounce”;(3) The marijuana was in the possession of the occupant of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. KittredgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. State v. SpicerOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. BrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. KoppenhaferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. Strubhar/JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API