Legal Opinion
State v. Koppenhafer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 15, 1982No. 81-353; CA A22876; 81-354; CA A22877PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
In these consolidated cases, the state appeals an order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The issue is whether the affidavit was sufficient to support the issuance of the warrant. Because we conclude that the affidavit was sufficient, we reverse.
The relevant portions of the affidavit state:
“That on 4/10/81, I was in contact with a confidential and reliable informant who in the past has furnished to myself and other members of the said Narcotics Detail a considerable amount of information regarding the illicit trafficking of narcotics and dangerous drugs in the Portland…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. KittredgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. SpicerOregon Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HorwedelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. Strubhar/JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. UrbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.