Legal Opinion

Soto v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 15, 1997No. 1 CA-SA 97-0059PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Judge.

Fifteen-year-old Pablo Soto (“Soto”) is charged with three counts of sexual assault, class 2 felonies. Soto petitioned for special action relief from his automatic transfer to superior court under Proposition 102’s amendments to the Arizona Constitution. In an earlier order, we accepted jurisdiction and denied relief. This opinion explains that order.

This is a case of first impression and the issues raised are purely legal ones likely to recur and to affect large numbers of juvenile defendants. We therefore accept jurisdiction. See JV-111701 v. Superior Ct., 163 Ariz. 147,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. ShawArizona Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Sarmiento-FunesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Governor v. Nevada State LegislatureNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. LUIS A. v. Bayham-LesselyongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Governor v. Nevada State LegislatureNevada Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API