LUIS A. v. Bayham-Lesselyong
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
¶ 1 In this consolidated special action, petitioners challenge the juvenile court’s failure to dismiss delinquency proceedings. Petitioners advance two contentions. First, they argue that the traffic citations used to commence their proceedings were defective because the citations failed to comport with the content requirements for delinquency petitions. Second, they contend that the State denied their right to speedy justice. On December 20, 1999, we heard oral argument and issued an order accepting jurisdiction, granting relief in part, and indicating that an opinion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nataros v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- J.D.S. v. FranksArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Andrade v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Matter of FleischmanArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Soto v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Blake v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Frimmel v. Hon. sanders/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Demarce v. WillrichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State ex rel. Wangberg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.