Legal Opinion

Fairfield v. Hamilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1962No. Civ. 25830PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

On July 7, 1958, Joseph W. Fairfield, appellant, brought this action in two counts against Jesse A. Hamilton, Evert L. Hagan, Charles M. Farrington, Matthew W. McClean and Robert 0. Ahlstrom, alleging that they (1) had combined and conspired to defame and injure him,' and, in pursuance of a preconceived plan, had prepared and mailed false and defamatory letters; and (2) had filed such legal proceedings against him as amounte_d to a malicious abuse of. process. McClean was not served. Appellant and Farrington executed a covenant in which appellant covenanted npt to -sue Farrington further in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Roemer v. Retail Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Babcock v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Golden v. DunganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API