Legal Opinion

State v. Montgomery

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2008No. 79564-9PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

183 P.3d 267 (2008)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Virgil R. MONTGOMERY, Petitioner.

No. 79564-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 17, 2008.

Decided May 15, 2008.

Steven J. Tucker, Attorney at Law, Mark Erik Lindsey, Spokane County Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

Carol A. Elewski, Attorney at Law, Tumwater, WA, for Petitioner.

CHAMBERS, J.

¶ 1 Virgil Montgomery challenges both his conviction for possession of pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine and his standard range 51-month sentence. Among other arguments, Montgomery asserts his trial…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. QuaaleWashington Supreme Court · 2014

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API