Legal Opinion

State v. Gamble

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2010No. Nos. 80131-2; 80405-2; 80469-9; 80536-9; 81389-2PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 In each of these consolidated cases the primary issue is whether the mandatory joinder rule barred the State from bringing additional homicide charges against the defendants after the defendants’ original convictions for second degree felony murder were overturned as a result of this court’s decision in In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602, 56 P.3d 981 (2002). We conclude *167that the mandatory joinder rule does not bar the homicide charges brought against the defendants.

FACTS

¶2 Each of the defendants was originally convicted of second degree felony murder with assault as the…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court · 2002

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. LundyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. BashawWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. Solis-DiazWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Bowie v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of CraceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API